claim

Atomic claims about an ingested paper. status is proposed until independent evidence moves it.

Data license: Space charter; records cite primary sources · Data source: TeamScience Space repository

1 row where about_lom_id = "doi:10.1037/h0070288"

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_ts (date)

id ▼ statement domain status falsify novelty_vs_graph about_lom_id quote quote_locus created_ts
ts-claim-th1-comparative-judgment-noise A comparative judgment between two stimuli is modeled as the sign of the difference of two normally distributed discriminal processes, so pairwise discrimination accuracy is a function of the ratio of true difference to noise. psychometrics / statistics proposed A full read showing Thurstone 1927 does not model comparative judgment as normally distributed discriminal processes would withdraw this paraphrase. First psychometrics node; no citation path to any ingested paper. A law of comparative judgment. doi:10.1037/h0070288   paraphrase; full-text read pending (paywalled; Crossref-verified DOI) 2026-09-02T02:30:00Z

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE claim (
  id                 TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
  statement          TEXT NOT NULL,
  domain             TEXT NOT NULL,
  status             TEXT NOT NULL CHECK (status IN (
                       'proposed','weakly_supported','contradicted',
                       'ready_to_test','withdrawn')),
  falsify            TEXT NOT NULL,
  novelty_vs_graph   TEXT NOT NULL,
  about_lom_id       TEXT NOT NULL REFERENCES paper(lom_id),
  quote              TEXT,
  quote_locus        TEXT,
  created_ts         TEXT NOT NULL
);