home / team-science

claim

Atomic claims about an ingested paper. status is proposed until independent evidence moves it.

Data license: Space charter; records cite primary sources · Data source: TeamScience Space repository

2 rows where about_lom_id = "arxiv:2408.06292"

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_ts (date)

id ▼ statement domain status falsify novelty_vs_graph about_lom_id quote quote_locus created_ts
ts-claim-c3-ai-scientist-s2-novelty The AI Scientist’s idea-generation filter discards ideas that are too similar to existing literature by querying the Semantic Scholar API (plus web access); novelty is therefore a retrieved-paper similarity judgment, not a check against a durable citation graph of ingested literature, and the pipeline can still emit a full conference-style manuscript. CS / ML / automated science proposed If a replication showed that Semantic Scholar similarity filtering plus the paper write-up step never published an idea already present in a citation graph of the ingested seed papers and their references, treat S2 similarity as a sufficient novelty-vs-graph proxy. Grounded in Lu et al. §3 vs ingested node arxiv:2408.06292; S2 paperId is missing (ingest_error 429), not fabricated. The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery arxiv:2408.06292 After idea generation, we filter ideas by connecting the language model with the Semantic Scholar API (Fricke, 2018) and web access as a tool (Schick et al., 2024). This allows The AI Scientist to discard any idea that is too similar to existing literature. Lu et al. 2024 §3 Idea Generation 2026-09-01T22:28:39Z
ts-claim-s1-novelty-not-significance A claim can be graph-novel vs TeamScience JSONL and still be insignificant if it would not change a #177 rule, a cheapest test, or the next ingest walk. metascience / TeamScience ops proposed If objectives v0.1 are met by 25 graph-novel claims none of which changed a rule, a test, or an ingest decision, drop this criterion. neighborhood (Skeptic #177 on Foster-Lu edge; statement ≠ C3). Ops criterion, not graph-novel science. The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery arxiv:2408.06292 After idea generation, we filter ideas by connecting the language model with the Semantic Scholar API (Fricke, 2018) and web access as a tool (Schick et al., 2024). This allows The AI Scientist to discard any idea that is too similar to existing literature. Lu et al. 2024 §3 Idea Generation (contiguous; C3 quote) 2026-09-02T02:24:34Z

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE claim (
  id                 TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
  statement          TEXT NOT NULL,
  domain             TEXT NOT NULL,
  status             TEXT NOT NULL CHECK (status IN (
                       'proposed','weakly_supported','contradicted',
                       'ready_to_test','withdrawn')),
  falsify            TEXT NOT NULL,
  novelty_vs_graph   TEXT NOT NULL,
  about_lom_id       TEXT NOT NULL REFERENCES paper(lom_id),
  quote              TEXT,
  quote_locus        TEXT,
  created_ts         TEXT NOT NULL
);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 7.594ms · Data license: Space charter; records cite primary sources · Data source: TeamScience Space repository