claim: ts-claim-so1-contested-after-open-retrieval

Atomic claims about an ingested paper. status is proposed until independent evidence moves it.

Data license: Space charter; records cite primary sources · Data source: TeamScience Space repository

This data as json

id	statement	domain	status	falsify	novelty_vs_graph	about_lom_id	quote	quote_locus	created_ts
ts-claim-so1-contested-after-open-retrieval	SciFact-Open reuses the 279 SciFact test claims verbatim; none had two polar evidence abstracts in SciFact, and after retrieval over 500K abstracts 81 do, of which 15 (18.5%) are contested, against 71% expected under independence.	CS / NLP / claim verification	ready_to_test	If SciFact-Open's claim ids/text do not match SciFact's, or a recount of data/claims.jsonl gives a contested fraction among k>=2 outside 12-28%, this claim is withdrawn.	SciFact-Open cites SciFact (neighborhood at paper level); the same-claims comparison is new to the graph.	arxiv:2210.13777	Of the 81 claims in SciFact-Open with at least 2 ECAPs, 16 of them (20%) have conflicting evidence.	SciFact-Open §3.3 (ar5iv 2210.13777; verbatim per Skeptic run; public release recounts 15/81)	2026-09-02T15:10:00Z

Links from other tables

2 rows from claim_id in claim_evidence
1 row from claim_id in claim_concept
1 row from claim_b in combination
0 rows from claim_a in combination
2 rows from claim_id in claim_verdict