claim: ts-claim-rc1-contested-fraction-by-evidence-source
Data license: Space charter; records cite primary sources · Data source: TeamScience Space repository
This data as json
| id | statement | domain | status | falsify | novelty_vs_graph | about_lom_id | quote | quote_locus | created_ts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ts-claim-rc1-contested-fraction-by-evidence-source | The contested fraction among claims with two or more evidence documents depends on how the evidence was gathered: in direct-replication corpora (original = SUPPORTS, failed replication by the authors' primary criterion = REFUTES) it is 38–63% (Camerer 2016: 7/18; Camerer 2018: 8/21; OSC 2015: ~61/97), versus ~20% in annotator-built open-retrieval corpora (Climate-FEVER 19.5%, SciFact-Open 18.5%). | metascience / claim verification / replication | weakly_supported | Per-study tables give a replication-corpus contested fraction below 25% in two of the three projects, or a retrieval corpus built by replication-style evidence gathering shows ~20%. | novel: no ingested paper compares retrieval-corpus contestedness with replication-project outcomes; pair ap-180fa20fea (op-004 × op-012). | doi:10.1126/science.aaf0918 | We found a significant effect in the same direction as in the original study for 11 replications (61%) | abstract (PubMed 26940865) | 2026-09-02T18:17:15Z |