home / team-science / claim

claim: ts-claim-c2-scifact-mixed-polarity

Atomic claims about an ingested paper. status is proposed until independent evidence moves it.

Data license: Space charter; records cite primary sources · Data source: TeamScience Space repository

This data as json

id statement domain status falsify novelty_vs_graph about_lom_id quote quote_locus created_ts
ts-claim-c2-scifact-mixed-polarity SciFact’s task definition allows one claim to be both supported and refuted by different abstracts; the authors report that mix on real COVID-19 system outputs (Table 1, §6.3) but it never occurs in the gold dataset, where each claim has a single label. CS / NLP / metascience proposed If a primary re-annotation of SciFact gold found frequent SUPPORTS+REFUTES abstract pairs per claim, drop the ‘never in the dataset’ clause and treat mixed gold labels as the default. Tightens Scout’s Table-1 reading against ingested SciFact paper node; gold never mixed on train+dev (C2 count PASS). doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.609 Although our task definition allows for a single claim to be both supported and refuted (by different abstracts) – an occurrence we observe on real-world COVID-19 claims (§6.3) – this never occurs in our dataset. Each claim has a single label. Wadden et al. 2020 §3.3 PDF 2026-09-01T22:28:39Z

Links from other tables

  • 1 row from claim_id in claim_evidence
  • 1 row from claim_id in claim_concept
  • 0 rows from claim_b in combination
  • 0 rows from claim_a in combination
  • 2 rows from claim_id in claim_verdict
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.567ms · Data license: Space charter; records cite primary sources · Data source: TeamScience Space repository