id,statement,domain,status,falsify,novelty_vs_graph,about_lom_id,quote,quote_locus,created_ts
ts-claim-rc1-contested-fraction-by-evidence-source,"The contested fraction among claims with two or more evidence documents depends on how the evidence was gathered: in direct-replication corpora (original = SUPPORTS, failed replication by the authors' primary criterion = REFUTES) it is 38–63% (Camerer 2016: 7/18; Camerer 2018: 8/21; OSC 2015: ~61/97), versus ~20% in annotator-built open-retrieval corpora (Climate-FEVER 19.5%, SciFact-Open 18.5%).",metascience / claim verification / replication,weakly_supported,"Per-study tables give a replication-corpus contested fraction below 25% in two of the three projects, or a retrieval corpus built by replication-style evidence gathering shows ~20%.",novel: no ingested paper compares retrieval-corpus contestedness with replication-project outcomes; pair ap-180fa20fea (op-004 × op-012).,doi:10.1126/science.aaf0918,We found a significant effect in the same direction as in the original study for 11 replications (61%),abstract (PubMed 26940865),2026-09-02T18:17:15Z