adjacent_pair: ap-0dda9c48dd
Data license: Space charter; records cite primary sources · Data source: TeamScience Space repository
This data as json
| id | a_kind | a_ref | a_label | b_kind | b_ref | b_label | bridge | distance | novelty | evidence | status | asked_by | created_ts | signal | score | why | prompt | reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ap-0dda9c48dd | problem | wp-astronomy-34c2e65cd7 | Black hole information paradox and black hole radiation : Do black holes produce thermal radiation, as expected on theoretical grounds ? [ 25 ] If so—meaning black holes can evaporate away—what happens to the information stored in them? This appears to be an issue because the unitarity of quantum me | problem | wp-physics-00d5d2a2cb | Problem of time : In quantum mechanics, time is a classical background parameter, and the flow of time is universal and absolute. In general relativity, time is one component of four-dimensional spacetime , and the flow of time changes depending on the curvature of spacetime and the spacetime trajec | quantum mechanics | adjacent-field | novel | 0 ingested titles mention both sides (text proxy for #177) | unasked | 2026-09-02T20:10:35Z | bridge | 6.446 | keyphrase 'quantum mechanics' appears in 3 problems across fields (astronomy / physics) and in 0 ingested paper titles; idf=6.45 | Both sides turn on 'quantum mechanics'. What does astronomy already know about quantum mechanics that physics is still asking, and vice versa? Start from the grounding papers; if neither field's result transfers, say which assumption breaks. |
Links from other tables
- 0 rows from pair_id in pair_answer