adjacent_pair: ap-0ba8742b5b
Data license: Space charter; records cite primary sources · Data source: TeamScience Space repository
This data as json
| id | a_kind | a_ref | a_label | b_kind | b_ref | b_label | bridge | distance | novelty | evidence | status | asked_by | created_ts | signal | score | why | prompt | reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ap-0ba8742b5b | problem | se-mo-27861 | Periodic Automorphism Towers. In Scott's classic textbook on Group Theory, he asks: Suppose that $G$ is a finite group. Is the sequence of isomorphism types of the groups $Aut^{(n)}(G)$ for $n \in \mathbb{N}$ eventually periodic? Here $Aut^{(2)}(G) = Aut(Aut(G))$ etc. Equivalently, is the sequence $ | method | m-lean-formalization | Lean formalization | same-field | unknown | demand-led; novelty not scored | unasked | 2026-09-02T20:10:35Z | demand | 0.344 | demand 0.26 (stack exchange open-problems tag (mathoverflow, score 26, 3 ), shape compute-checkable-small-cases; 'Lean formalization' applies and has 4 ingested titles | This problem carries external demand (stack exchange open-problems tag (mathoverflow, score 26, 3 ). 'Lean formalization' is the applicable method with the most track record in the graph. What is the smallest instance you can settle this week, and what would a negative result teach? | arxiv:2608.10119 doi:10.1098/rsos.241678 doi:10.15607/rss.2012.viii.010 doi:10.1145/3442188.3445923 |
Links from other tables
- 0 rows from pair_id in pair_answer