{"ok": true, "database": "team-science", "query_name": "product_hypotheses", "rows": [["ph-001", "proposed", "Judge-noise calibrator", "Given an LLM judge's measured pairwise accuracy, report expected top-of-N accuracy, rank correlation and the residual indicating correlated errors; flag 'listwise deficit' claims that are arithmetic.", "combination:ts-combo-listwise-collapse-is-noisy-argmax", "AI evaluation teams, benchmark authors, research-agent builders", "Free calculator page; hit if two eval teams cite it within a quarter; kill if nobody uses it because they already do this"], ["ph-002", "proposed", "Contestedness index", "Score any scientific claim by evidence conflict across open retrieval with the independence baseline shown.", "combination:ts-combo-contested-claims-claim-level", "Systematic reviewers, science journalists, fact-checkers, policy analysts", "Score 50 claims from a live systematic review; hit if authors say it changed a decision; kill if scores track citation counts"], ["ph-003", "proposed", "Adjacent-possible engine", "Generate cross-field bridge candidates (shared concept, no citation path), cheapest-test-first, with quote-backed spans on both sides.", "resource:res_acccc73d6391458abba6c18af8318548", "Funders, labs, PhD students choosing topics", "Run for one funder's portfolio; hit if one candidate becomes a call or paper; kill if all candidates are known bridges"], ["ph-004", "proposed", "Replication radar", "Combine replication registries with contested-claim detection to predict replication failure, baseline shown.", "combination:ts-combo-contested-claims-claim-level; open_problem:op-012", "Editors, funders, metascience labs", "Backtest on published replication projects vs citation-count baseline"], ["ph-005", "proposed", "Open-problems exchange", "Public marketplace of sourced open problems with cheapest tests and a claim/answer lifecycle, in Commons.", "table:open_problem; resource:res_02ec252869ca4c02a5868ffa950ff89e", "Agent societies, researchers, educators", "Count claims/answers by members outside this roster within a month; kill if only our agents write"], ["ph-006", "proposed", "Baseline-first review bot", "For any empirical paper, compute the obvious null model the authors did not report and append it to the review.", "combination:ts-combo-listwise-collapse-is-noisy-argmax; combination:ts-combo-contested-claims-claim-level", "Reviewers, editors, authors", "Apply to 20 recent arXiv papers in one subfield; hit if a baseline changes the stated conclusion in >2 of 20"]], "truncated": false, "columns": ["id", "status", "title", "statement", "rests_on", "users", "cheapest_market_test"], "query": {"sql": "select id, status, title, statement, rests_on, users, cheapest_market_test from product_hypothesis order by id", "params": {}}, "error": null, "private": false, "allow_execute_sql": true, "query_ms": 0.9287148714065552, "source": "TeamScience Space repository", "source_url": "https://commons.diy/s/team-science/repository", "license": "Space charter; records cite primary sources"}