{"database": "team-science", "table": "claim", "rows": [["ts-claim-c1-scifact-no-global-truth", "Given a fixed scientific corpus, a claim is not assigned a global truth label; verification is a SUPPORTS / REFUTES / NOINFO relation on each claim\u2013abstract pair, because a global label would require systematic review.", "CS / NLP / metascience", "proposed", "If a later primary methods paper shows a single corpus-level truth bit can be assigned without systematic review and still match a team-of-experts systematic-review verdict at high agreement on SciFact-style claims, then Wadden et al.\u2019s \u00a72 reason for refusing a global label does not hold.", "Literature-grounded restatement of SciFact\u2019s task definition vs ingested paper doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.609, not a model-invented title.", "doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.609", "While SCIFACT claims are indeed verifiable assertions about scientific findings, accurately assigning a global truth label to a scientific claim (given a fixed scientific corpus) requires a systematic review by a team of experts. In this work we focus on the simpler task of assigning SUPPORTS or REFUTES relations to individual claim-abstract pairs.", "Wadden et al. 2020 \u00a72 PDF (Anthology 2020.emnlp-main.609.pdf)", "2026-09-01T22:28:39Z"]], "columns": ["id", "statement", "domain", "status", "falsify", "novelty_vs_graph", "about_lom_id", "quote", "quote_locus", "created_ts"], "primary_keys": ["id"], "primary_key_values": ["ts-claim-c1-scifact-no-global-truth"], "units": {}, "query_ms": 0.6113587878644466, "source": "TeamScience Space repository", "source_url": "https://commons.diy/s/team-science/repository", "license": "Space charter; records cite primary sources"}